← Back to the John C D Doe case page

Other Cases Citing John C D Doe

A record of public filings in other child sexual abuse cases that cite or list John C D Doe v Big Brothers Big Sisters of America, Arizona Superior Court Case CV2020-014920.

What these citations show
The records below are briefs or amicus briefs filed in other cases. A brief records what a party or supporting organization asked a court to consider; its citation does not by itself show that the court adopted the argument. The documents cite the Arizona case as an example concerning the constitutionality of laws that revive child sexual abuse claims. They cite the case; they do not quote a passage from its ruling.

Public case filings

The Key School, Incorporated, et al. v Valerie Bunker

Supreme Court of Maryland · Misc. No. 2, September Term 2024 · Appellee’s response brief, August 7, 2024

Valerie Bunker’s brief cites John C D Doe in footnote 15 on page 60, among examples offered in support of the argument that child sexual abuse claim revival laws can withstand constitutional challenges. The brief describes the Arizona matter as a trial-court decision and notes that review was denied by the Arizona Supreme Court.

Robert E. Dupuis et al. v Roman Catholic Bishop of Portland

Maine Supreme Judicial Court · Docket BCD-23-122 · Child USA and other amici brief, filed September 14, 2023

The amicus brief lists Arizona’s revival law as constitutional in its state-by-state survey and cites John C D Doe in footnote 27 on page 23. The Maine court later held the retroactive application of Maine’s law unconstitutional in its January 28, 2025 opinion. That opinion does not cite John C D Doe.

Aurora Public Schools and David James O’Neill v Angelica Saupe and Brian Saupe

Colorado · Child USA amicus brief supporting the Saupes

The amicus brief lists John C D Doe in its table of authorities and cites it in footnote 31 on page 23, within a cross-state discussion of decisions addressing revival laws for childhood sexual abuse claims. This is an amicus argument, not a court finding about the Arizona case.