Independent Arizona Court Record Archive

JOHN C D DOE v. BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF AMERICA and BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL ARIZONA

Maricopa County Superior Court | Case No. CV2020-014920

Explore 112 Court Documents

Illustrative image only · not the actual courthouse

ARCHIVE SNAPSHOTCoverage through October 14, 2026

Latest archived filing: A112

October 14, 2026: John C D Doe filed a response to the motion to strike and sanctions request (Filing ID 22998618, 3 pages). This is a party filing, not a court ruling.

The archive lists documents through this date. The court docket may contain later entries.

THE PUBLIC RECORD

Follow the documents.
Examine the case.

A navigable archive of court filings concerning a civil childhood sexual abuse case involving Big Brothers Big Sisters organizations. Explore the record and verify developments against the official court docket.

The Court Record

This independent archive organizes court documents relating to JOHN C D DOE v. Big Brothers Big Sisters of America and Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Arizona.

The archive is intended to make court filings easier to locate, search, and read. It is not an official court website.

112Indexed filings
2020–2026Filing years
Oct. 14, 2026Latest filing listed

Arizona Sexual Abuse Case Records

This independent public-record archive covers JOHN C D DOE v. Big Brothers Big Sisters of America and Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Arizona, a civil case in the Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County (Case No. CV2020-014920). The case involves claims of childhood sexual abuse. The archive provides access to 112 court filings and related case information.

If you searched for “sex abuse Arizona,” this page identifies one specific Arizona case and links to its public court record. It is not a statewide directory or an official court website. Allegations are claims; consult the filed orders and official docket for what the court has decided.

Read the Arizona case guide and official-record links · Check the Maricopa County court docket

Search the Court Documents

Search by document title, filing number, date, or document type. Each entry opens its complete individual PDF directly, with all pages available in your browser’s PDF reader.

Title and date notes: Titles follow the visible filing heading where available. A few exhibit entries use the section heading visible in the PDF when the parent filing title is not shown on that page. Dates are transcribed from a PDF filing header or court stamp when legible; entries marked “Date not verified” do not show a reliable filing date in the available copy. Check each PDF for the complete record. All 112 court filings are available as individual PDFs.

Case Timeline

A short guide to events represented in the archive. The labels distinguish party-submitted filings from court-issued orders; they do not summarize every docket entry. Check the official docket for the authoritative record and current case status.

Archive review: October 19, 2026 · Coverage through October 14, 2026

Method: this independent archive indexes publicly available filing PDFs, records document titles and dates when verified, and links readers to the official docket. It may not include every entry or later update. Use the court docket to confirm current status and any newer filings.

Browse the 2020–2026 filing archive ↗

2020

The civil case was filed in Maricopa County Superior Court.

Party filing
2021

The archive includes an amended complaint and motion-to-dismiss briefing. The court denied the motion to dismiss on August 26, 2021.

Party filingCourt order
2022–2024

Answers, notices, and other party submissions appear alongside scheduling and case-management orders.

Party filingCourt order
2025

The archive includes bankruptcy-related materials, party motions concerning the real party in interest, amended complaints, and related court entries.

Party filingCourt order
2026

The archive records a settlement notice, a court order placing the case on the dismissal calendar, and later party filings addressing case status through October 14.

Party filingCourt order
PRESS & RESEARCH

Journalist & Researcher Resources

For journalists, researchers, attorneys, and members of the public examining this litigation, the primary materials are available without registration. This site is an independent archive, not an official court website.

01 / CASE IDENTIFICATION

Case at a glance

Caption: JOHN C D DOE v. Big Brothers Big Sisters of America and Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Arizona

Case: CV2020-014920
Court: Maricopa County Superior Court, Arizona

02 / PRIMARY DOCUMENTS

Read the filings

Review the indexed collection of 112 PDF filings. The archive identifies document titles, dates when verified, and document types.

Search the court-document archive ↗

03 / VERIFICATION

Check the official record

Confirm the current procedural status and subsequent filings with the court. Statements in party motions are not judicial findings.

Maricopa County case docket ↗

Editorial standard: This case concerns allegations of childhood sexual abuse. Allegations, party positions, and court findings must be distinguished. The inclusion of a filing does not establish the truth of every assertion within it.

Research Links & Survivor Resources

Use the official sources below to check the record and explore related information. The listed related case is separate from CV2020-014920; survivor resources are included for visitors who may want support.

Arizona courts

Public case lookup

Search case information across participating Arizona courts. The Judicial Branch cautions that this service is not the official court record.

Open Arizona Public Access ↗
Related statute

A.R.S. § 12-514

Read the Arizona Legislature’s published text of the statute concerning certain civil actions arising from sexual conduct or contact against a minor.

Read the statute text ↗

This is an independent archive, not a court or legal service. Verify case information against the official docket. The links to legal materials are for research and do not state how any law applies to this case.